<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Opinion on @ppmotskula</title>
    <link>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/tags/opinion/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Opinion on @ppmotskula</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>et-ee</language>
    <managingEditor>peeterpaul@motskula.net (Peeter P. Mõtsküla)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>peeterpaul@motskula.net (Peeter P. Mõtsküla)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/tags/opinion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Online privacy? Forget it!</title>
      <link>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/2010/01/09/online-privacy-forget-it/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>peeterpaul@motskula.net (Peeter P. Mõtsküla)</author>
      <guid>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/2010/01/09/online-privacy-forget-it/</guid>
      
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Let me start from a bold prediction and a daring statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The prediction is that in 2020, online privacy will be more or less in the same place where digital copyright is today: there will be a growing majority of people who knowingly violate the respective laws on the grounds that the legal system has remained inert while the real life has moved on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statement is that privacy laws and copyright laws have nearly nothing to do with the interests of their alleged subjects &amp;mdash; the individuals and authors, respectively. Instead, they serve the interests of the &amp;ldquo;big guys&amp;rdquo; in each scene. In case of copyright, this means the &amp;ldquo;copyright industries&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; record labels, movie studios, &amp;ldquo;old school&amp;rdquo; software companies, publishing houses, etc. In case of privacy, this means the institutions who are the biggest processors of personal information today &amp;mdash; national, state, and local governments as well as banks, insurance companies, telecoms and utilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Twitter Panic in Elbonia</title>
      <link>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/2009/11/13/twitter-panic-in-elbonia/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>peeterpaul@motskula.net (Peeter P. Mõtsküla)</author>
      <guid>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/2009/11/13/twitter-panic-in-elbonia/</guid>
      
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sten Tamkivi &lt;a href=&#34;http://twitter.com/seikatsu/status/5643578434&#34;&gt;tweeted&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If this tax change happens, Estonia can say goodbye to any new international tech companies: &lt;a href=&#34;http://bit.ly/2UVEC7&#34;&gt;http://bit.ly/2UVEC7&lt;/a&gt; Outrageous!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This sparked a serial outrage of retweets and Facebook comments. Many people became heavily opinionated about an opinion leader&amp;rsquo;s opinion about a journalist&amp;rsquo;s opinion based on a [possibly, but not necessarily] out-of-context quotation of a tax lawyer. But few, if any, took the trouble to dig out the original source &amp;mdash; the &lt;a href=&#34;http://eoigus.just.ee/?act=6&amp;amp;subact=1&amp;amp;OTSIDOC_W=266693&#34; title=&#34;[eoigus.just.ee - in Estonian]&#34;&gt;draft law&lt;/a&gt; containing the proposed changes to the &lt;a href=&#34;http://kasulik.info/wlex/?act=TuMS&amp;amp;now=12.11.2009&#34; title=&#34;[kasulik.info/wlex - in Estonian]&#34;&gt;income tax law&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
