<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Freedom on @ppmotskula</title>
    <link>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/tags/freedom/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Freedom on @ppmotskula</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>et-ee</language>
    <managingEditor>peeterpaul@motskula.net (Peeter P. Mõtsküla)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>peeterpaul@motskula.net (Peeter P. Mõtsküla)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/tags/freedom/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Online privacy? Forget it!</title>
      <link>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/2010/01/09/online-privacy-forget-it/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>peeterpaul@motskula.net (Peeter P. Mõtsküla)</author>
      <guid>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/2010/01/09/online-privacy-forget-it/</guid>
      
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Let me start from a bold prediction and a daring statement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The prediction is that in 2020, online privacy will be more or less in the same place where digital copyright is today: there will be a growing majority of people who knowingly violate the respective laws on the grounds that the legal system has remained inert while the real life has moved on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The statement is that privacy laws and copyright laws have nearly nothing to do with the interests of their alleged subjects &amp;mdash; the individuals and authors, respectively. Instead, they serve the interests of the &amp;ldquo;big guys&amp;rdquo; in each scene. In case of copyright, this means the &amp;ldquo;copyright industries&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; record labels, movie studios, &amp;ldquo;old school&amp;rdquo; software companies, publishing houses, etc. In case of privacy, this means the institutions who are the biggest processors of personal information today &amp;mdash; national, state, and local governments as well as banks, insurance companies, telecoms and utilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Open letter to IFJ</title>
      <link>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/2008/02/13/open-letter-to-ifj/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>peeterpaul@motskula.net (Peeter P. Mõtsküla)</author>
      <guid>https://peeterpaul.motskula.net:443/2008/02/13/open-letter-to-ifj/</guid>
      
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Referring to &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.ifj.org/default.asp?Index=5807&amp;amp;Language=EN&#34;&gt;IFJ Appeals to Microsoft as Russia Uses Anti-Piracy Campaign as a Cover for Media Intimidation&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why don&amp;rsquo;t you consider an opportunity to help Russian independent media outlets migrate to free/libre open-source software (FLOSS) instead of begging Microsoft to donate free or discounted licenses for their computers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With more than 20 years of computing experience, having worked in and with newspapers, and having first-hand knowledge of Windows, Mac OS X and Linux operating systems, I dare to say that FLOSS is a suitable alternative for most people employed in a media organization.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
